Living with BSL – Lori’s Perspective

loris dogAs part of our #BSLbytes campaign, we asked people to share their personal experiences and insights about BSL. Lori Gray, Ontario Director and board member of ASTCC (American Staffordshire Terrier Club of Canada) wrote this on Facebook last year and we felt that it deserved a wider share.

In Canada we live in a bubble, taking quite a few things for granted.

We travel freely, are free to choose who we hang out with, who we marry or don’t, where we live, what kind of house or how much property we can afford to own or rent. We can get a great education, job, raise a family. We can speak freely without censorship. We are entitled to fair and equal treatment… or are we?

If you live in Ontario or some municipal jurisdictions in Canada, you live with a law that bans certain dogs based on their appearance. In Ontario you are not allowed to travel freely across or enter the province with a dog that is one of the named purebreds or the much more popular short-haired mutt. It doesn’t matter what you consider your dog to be –  it’s what the enforcer’s opinion dictates. There have been myriad shapes, sizes, and colours of dogs that have been targeted by animal control, police officers, or SPCA agents.

You are not allowed to own the dog of your choice in these jurisdictions. You may find the dog of your dreams but that can all become a nightmare quite quickly by a nosy neighbour with an irrational fear of dogs, or an Animal Control Officer passing by your car or backyard.

If you have a dog that is “grandfathered”,  that dog will now be over 12 years old. They must be spayed/neutered, muzzled, leashed, not allowed in most dog parks, etc. If the targeted dog is less than 12 years old they are automatically considered to be illegal or prohibited by law. They can be seized, killed, shipped out of province never to be seen again, or sold for research.

You can fight the allegations that a dog is a “pit bull” because this term is not a breed name but a slang term for the APBT and has now become generalized as a term for any short haired mutt. The only way to prove breed in dogs is if the dog is a registered purebred. Under Canadian law (Animals for Pedigree Act) purebred animals must be chipped or tattooed so they are easy to distinguish. All others are classified as mixed breed.

Of the cases where people have gone to court, they win, but most people feel they cannot afford a lawyer or they become too afraid of the extortion tactics from the enforcers: “sign your dog over or else you will receive a $10K fine and jail time”.

I am going to attempt to describe to you what life is like living with BSL.

Luckily, my neighbours are great, but one of them recently mentioned they are going to be listing their house in the spring and moving down east to retire. My first thought was not, “How nice for you!” but rather,  “Oh no! What if the new neighbours don’t like dogs or have an irrational fear of pit bulls?” My dogs are registered purebred American Staffordshire Terriers. The one saving grace is that nearly all people who meet them say “what breed are they?” Most people have never met a real one since they are extremely rare in Canada. There were less than 30 in the province of Ontario when the ban was passed and they aren’t rare because of BSL. They were rare to begin with.

I have lost over a decade of my life fighting for a repeal of BSL in Ontario. Countless hours spent working hundreds of booths. Fundraising to pay the $750K legal case where the government of Ontario fought us (at the taxpayer’s expense) every step of the way. We went all the way to Supreme Court of Canada but did not make the cut and were not heard. They only hear roughly 10% of cases filed.

I continue to volunteer countless hours helping those who have been targeted. This law targets those who cannot fight for themselves. Lower socioeconomic brackets and visible minorities are most often the targets of this law. We say we live in a free country. Some of us beg to differ.

How has this changed me?

I am extremely distrustful of the government because I’ve witnessed first-hand the dismissal of factual evidence in favour of fear -based opinions that suit a politician’s agenda.

I have become hardened. I am tired of explaining myself and why “pit bulls” are the perfect red herring in the history of nefarious lawmaking. Your rights and freedoms are stripped while people run around with their hair on fire about so-called “pit bulls”, or rather dogs with short hair and unknown lineage. The only thing theses dogs have in common is that they are dogs. The rest is myth, urban legend and – frankly – BS.

I have lost my sense of safety within my own home, community, province, and country. I never used to worry too much about who might live next door or who might see my dogs while I’m out walking or in the car. Now I worry that someone might report some fabricated story about my dogs being threatening or menacing. They barked at someone. Looked sideways at a cat. (Injuring a cat on my own property is punishable by death!)

I lost my zest for participating in dog-related sports, socializing and classes. I think twice about taking them with me when visiting friends or family. I worry about their neighbours and the reaction they may have.

I have considered moving away from my home in order to live without the stress of constantly looking over my shoulder but I refuse to be driven from my home because of incompetent government lawmaking. I don’t want to rebuild my home or business, and I don’t want to leave my family and friends or community behind. I have visited another province with my dogs that doesn’t have BSL and while it was freeing, I’ve become so conditioned that I don’t know that I could ever go back to not looking over my shoulder. I am confident we will see a repeal but I don’t feel I could go back to feeling safe.

I worry that in case of an emergency my dogs wouldn’t be saved based on their appearance.

That’s just a taste of what it’s like living with BSL. It leaves you with a sick feeling. I feel hyper sensitive about protecting my dogs. At the same time, though I am very vocal, I don’t personalize my position or involve my dogs personally. It’s not about them or me. It’s a big picture. It’s about standing for what it means to live freely in a so called democratic society.

It irritates me that those who don’t live with BSL don’t learn from what we live. It bothers me when people refer to their mix breed dogs as “pit bulls” based on their looks. Even if you don’t currently have BSL why take chances? Why feed the beast? It can happen in the blink of an eye. Recently the city of Montreal banned the three typical purebreds and “pit bulls” based on a knee jerk reaction to a dog bite related fatality in the city. The breed was never determined of the dog involved in the incident. Even if breed was or could be determined, how does it make sense to blame an entire population of dogs for the gross incompetence of a specific dog owner?

There is no evidence to support that any dog is dangerous based on breed or appearance. That is a fact.

The province of Quebec is planning to pass Bill 128 this year banning the three typical breeds, “pit bulls “, and they also plan to add Rottweilers. American Staffordshire Terriers, American Pit Bull Terriers and Staffordshire Bull Terriers are among Canada’s rarest breeds. Rottweilers are also quite rare in Quebec. Here are the past decade’s stats for registries with the Canadian Kennel Club for Quebec and nationwide.

 lori AST table

lori rottweiler table 

I guess its human nature to not pay attention when it doesn’t directly affect you but I do remember prior to the ban here: I was very plugged in and horrified at what was happening in the UK, Germany, Denver, Miami, other jurisdictions with BSL. I learned all I could learn because at that time I had two awesome short-haired mix breed dogs that could have been targets of BSL. I remember thinking we are smarter or better than that here in Canada.

Boy was I wrong!

loris dogs2

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Living with BSL – Lori’s Perspective

Take a byte out of BSL

33797198734_c4a1aa1acd_zIt’s unbelievable that in 2017, we are in the position of fighting a second provincial breed ban in our country. To keep it in perspective, remember that on the whole, BSL is on its way out. There are many more jurisdictions rejecting or repealing breed-specific legislation compared to those implementing it. It’s being actively challenged in places like the UK, Australia, and Ontario, where this kind of legislation has been entrenched for a decade. Half of American states have state-wide legislation prohibiting laws that discriminate by breed.

However, despite this progress, we are facing Bill 128 in Quebec – a law that is poorly written, vague, and does nothing to address known factors for dog aggression.

Bill 128, like all breed-specific legislation, is fear-based. And although we are limited in what we can do from this side of the country, we can fight fear with facts. HugABull, in partnership with Justice for Bullies and the Ontario “Pit Bull” Co-op, we’d like to announce a brand-new educational campaign: 150 BSL Facts for #Canada150.

Starting May 15, 2017 we will post daily for 150 days, sharing a bite-sized fact, insight, story or trivia about BSL. The aim is to encourage people to share education rather than discrimination and keep this topic in the public conversation. Let us remember that while in many ways we are fortunate to live in Canada, there are some areas in which our policy makers fail us and need to do better. In support of the campaign, we will use the hashtags #BSLbytes #notoBill128 and #Canada150.

Send us ideas! You can send topics you’d like to see covered, a story that touched you – or create a BSL byte of your own. Text-based bytes should be no more than 90 words and any statistics or quotes should be cited. Photos and videos under 1 minute are welcome too.

Email info@hugabull.com or justiceforbullies@gmail.com, or post on any of our respective social media sites. And share!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Take a byte out of BSL

Speak up against BSL on May 13

Quebec posterIt’s almost a week away! On Saturday, May 13, groups across Canada will be marching against the proposed breed ban in Quebec. In BC, you can join groups in Vancouver, Victoria, or Coquitlam. See our previous post for event details.

Below are a few resources to spread the word:

Event poster for Vancouver and Coquitlam events. Please feel free to download, print, poster, and share.
PDF version
JPG version

 

Social media graphic
18301914_10154493310593016_6040632428835784383_nJPG version

 

 

 

If you aren’t able to attend on Saturday, May 13, please show your solidarity by posting an educational message on social media. We will provide images for re-sharing, and we encourage you to post a thoughtful, fact-based message about BSL. Tell someone something new and unexpected about breed-specific legislation, or talk about how it’s affected you or someone you know. Please help us create a sea of solidarity for those in Quebec living in fear today.

Here are some great sources for facts and talking points around BSL:

HugABull.com (click on BSL)
DogBiteFacts.org
Montreal SPCA’s Safer Kinder Communities campaign
Animal Farm Foundation Talking Points E-Book

You can also choose to make a small donation to a rescue, advocacy, or education group working with affected dogs and families. There are several groups that are active in Quebec and we hear they are doing amazing work – but because we are far away and can’t vouch for them personally at this time, we are directing people to the Montreal SPCA’s Safer Kinder Communities campaign (visit saferkindercommunities.com and click “make a gift” in the top right corner). And of course, you can also donate to HugABull and request that your donation be directed to BSL work.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Speak up against BSL on May 13

Show Your Solidarity for Quebec on May 13

6Quebec’s proposed Bill 128 will be a major step back for animal welfare in Canada. In its current form, it:

  • Violates the province’s current legislation declaring animals to be sentient beings.
  • Proposes a ban on pit bull breeds, Rottweilers, and their mixes (the nature or percentage of a mix is not defined). Also bans wolf and other “non-canine” hybrids.
  • Allows other breeds to be added to the list at any time.
  • Dogs “trained to protect, guard, fight or attack” are also prohibited, but these terms are not defined.
  • Defers to veterinarians for breed identification and behaviour assessments (vets are medical professionals, not behaviour or breed experts – this is like asking your doctor to assess your ethnicity!)
  • Allows family pets to be destroyed or sold to research laboratories.
  • Allows city staff to be designated as “inspectors” to stop citizens or vehicles, interrogate them, and order them to produce paperwork for their dog.
  • Does nothing to address known risk factors for dog aggression such as irresponsible breeding, poor socialization and care, and owner behaviour.

This is fear-based legislation that will destroy families and kill dogs based on nothing more than visual characteristics. Canadians deserve better. Quebec advocates are hard at work, and to show our solidarity, rallies are planned on Saturday, March 13 in BC:

muralVancouver
11am at Science World
1455 Quebec Street
Info and updates on the Facebook event page.

Victoria
11am at the BC Parliament Buildings
501 Belleville Street
Info and updates on the Facebook event page.

Coquitlam
11am at Lafarge Lake
(Town Centre Park)
Info and updates on the Facebook event page.

Dogs are welcome at the above events if they are leashed and well-mannered. This is a public event and media will likely be present – all eyes will be on us so it’s important that we present a positive presence. Signs, shirts, and slogans are welcome as long as the tone is respectful and constructive.

Interested in seeing an event in your community? Check the “Solidarity Against Quebec’s Canine Discrimination” Facebook page for listings. If you don’t see your city there, organize one of your own! Email us at info@hugabull.com for tips.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Show Your Solidarity for Quebec on May 13

Talking BSL with your Strata – Joanne and Brian’s story

joanne-blog-postWe are frequently contacted by people in strata and rental housing that are affected by breed-specific language. Sometimes those in charge stand by these policies, even though they are outdated and ineffective, and turn away responsible owners. But many policy makers will respond favourably when presented with breed-neutral, common-sense alternatives. If you face a situation like this, visit the BSL section on our website  and contact us for advice and resources.

It began simply enough. Joanne and Brian Windsor, along with other owners in their building, were each asked to pay $80 for a lawyer to update their bylaws. To their dismay, however, one of the proposed changes would bar “pit bulls”, American Staffordshire Terriers, bull terriers – and any combination thereof – from living there.

“We have a bully breed named Loda,” explains Joanne, “and our daughter, Kyla, who lives with us, has Loda’s sister Jayden. Both dogs would lick you to death before they attacked you.”

With no breed-specific legislation in the City of Port Coquitlam, and determined to fight the strata’s proposed changes, Joanne not only contacted us, but did her own research online. She came to the strata meeting fully prepared.

Granted the floor when the matter of the bylaw was brought up, she asked the property management representative who had requested that the original wording of “no dangerous animal” be changed to the breed-specific wording. The answer: the lawyers had been responsible for the new wording.

“Armed with that information, I stated my opposition to the bylaw and said there was no breed-specific bylaw in the City of Port Coquitlam. I discussed the media’s often erroneous, irresponsible and inflammatory reporting, and how their skewed views have affected public opinion, making people want to ban German Shepherds in the 1980’s, Dobermans in the 1990’s, and Rottweilers in the 2000’s.

“I offered statistics showing pit bulls rank seventh in bite frequency, while conceding theirs were obviously more severe than those of Chihuahuas. I showed them an article from our local newspaper about a Bichon Frise, deemed by the city council to be vicious and dangerous, when this small breed is usually sweet and docile.

“I pointed to an article about a 6-week-old baby who was bitten by the family pit bull, and mentioned how irresponsible the parents were to have allowed the dog near their child WITHOUT adult supervision. I emphasized that, in cases like these, the DOG is not at fault, and that it’s the duty of all dog owners to raise their dogs properly and responsibly, no matter the breed. I argued that most pit bull owners ARE responsible, and shouldn’t have to pay for the irresponsible ones. I referenced the ‘fight or flight’ principle, in that, like humans, dogs, when feeling threatened, will either flee or fight.”

joanne-blog-post-2A lawyer had already told her that if the matter went to court, Loda and Jayden would be considered members of the family, and that they couldn’t be removed from the premises without any prior complaints against them. Using this as part of her final argument before the strata, Joanne requested the wording of the bylaw be returned to read “any dangerous animal” and focus on behaviour rather than breed.

To the delight and relief of the entire Windsor family, a vote was taken and 100 percent of those in attendance agreed. The previous language stood, and no dog would be targeted by the bylaws simply because of his or her appearance.

Written by Nomi Berger

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Talking BSL with your Strata – Joanne and Brian’s story

Radio-Canada takes a bite out of pseudoscience

freedom-glassesWhen reporters are tasked to investigate stories, including dog bite stories, they are looking to include a few key things in their rush to deadline. They look for juicy quotes. They look for digestible statistics. And they try to make a nod to “both sides” of an issue, whatever they define those to be.

So when they seek information to support the position that “risk factors exist to predict aggression but breed is not one of them” there are a lot of sources to use – advocacy groups, veterinary/animal control/animal behaviour professional organizations, peer-reviewed research, and these days, pretty much anyone who works first-hand with dogs.

When they are looking for something to support the argument that “certain breeds of dogs are inherently more dangerous” they find one source on the internet. They might find a few sites, but they all lead back to two related groups. These groups manufacture their own “studies” and generate “statistics” that sound horrifying. It doesn’t take much to scratch the surface and see that the numbers don’t make sense, but few people take time to do so, and these numbers are seen in reporting and in BSL discussions everywhere. The truth is, NO reliable numbers exist for overall bite rates, serious bites, or breed and bites, because this is not tracked systematically. Anywhere.

Alas, in the wake of the proposed Montreal breed ban, one news outlet took the time to really dig into the phenomenon of these soundbite-oriented statistics. Bouchra Ouatik of CBC Radio-Canada dug into these numbers and the characters who generate them. The article has been shared widely but until now, only a Google Translate version has been available. One of our bilingual volunteers has been kind enough to translate it for us for easier reading. Please read, share, and click on the original link so the article gets the hits it deserves!

Pit bulls: Non-scientific data frequently quoted by media.
Friday September 9th, 2016
Bouchra Ouatik

Statistics on dog bites, coming from anti-pit bull groups, are often quoted in Canadian and American media as being reliable sources. These figures are however very far from reality.

The two groups in question, Animals 24-7 and DogsBite.org, often campaign openly to ban pit bulls. They regularly publish statistics on deaths and bites caused by dogs. However, their figures only represent a tiny portion of serious attacks, and those from Animals 24-7 contain many errors.

A tiny portion of serious attacks.

The author of the Animals 24-7 site, Merrit Clifton, publishes data every year on the number of attacks by dogs in Canada and the United States. The group’s most recent report claims to account for almost every serious attack having taken place between September 1982 and September 2016, a period of 34 years. M. Clifton claims to get his data solely from media reports, but he maintains that he has a comprehensive picture of the situation.

According to this report, during the 34 years studied, there would have been, all breeds included, 5756 dog attacks causing serious injury, 4194 attacks having mutilated or disfigured the victim, and 652 deaths. The author defines serious attacks as being those where the victim has been killed, mutilated, or has received wounds necessitating serious medical care. According to these same figures, pitbull type dogs were responsible for 78% of serious attacks, 70% of attacks causing mutilation or disfigurement of the victim, and 53% of deaths.

This would mean there would be on average 169 serious attacks and 19 deaths every year in Canada and the United States.

But these numbers are very far from reality.

 

According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, in 2008, in the United States, almost 9500 people have been hospitalized due to dog bites, and roughly 40 died from their injuries, or substantially more than the numbers put forth by Animals 24-7. Of this amount, there were 600 fractures, 300 surgeries requiring skin grafts, and 1100 operations on muscles or tendons. These figures however do not mention the breeds of the dogs involved.

Even so, in only one year, more people have been hospitalized for serious injuries due to dogs than Animals 24-7 has compiled in 34 years.

Deaths and serious injuries caused by deaths

Category Animals 24-7
(annual average)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (for 2008)
Attacks requiring hospitalization 169 9500
Deaths 19 More than 40 (only in hospitals)

The figures from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons follow the same direction. In 2015, in the United States, there were 28079 reconstructive surgeries for dog bites, and in 2000, that number rose to 43089. We should also note that a person can require more than one surgical procedure for the same injury.

This important discrepancy between the figures from Animals 24-7 and reality can be explained in part by the fact that the majority of dog attacks are not reported in the media. The owner of Animals 24-7, Merrit Clifton, has pointed out via email that it is possible that he has missed a few cases of serious injury.

Meanwhile, the DogsBite.org site regularly publishes the numbers from Animals 24-7, in addition to maintaining its own list of incidents. Colleen Lynn, the founder of DogsBite.org, herself a bite victim, explains that her site does not claim to tabulate all serious dog bites, but that it tabulates the majority of deaths. She also claims that her site does not only rely on media reports, but also draws its figures from other sources, such as police reports, and that her site sometimes publishes cases that have not been mentioned in the media.

Several inconsistencies

The figures from Animals 24-7 underestimate the attacks perpetrated by breeds other than pit bulls. For example, according to this group, in 34 years, throughout the United States and Canada, there were 66 serious attacks by chow-chows, and 67 by Labradors. However, according to the Texas department of health, in 2000, in that state only, there were 67 severe bites from chow-chows, and 39 from Labradors.

In Animals 24-7’s report, the same breed of dogs can be found in many categories, or several different breeds can be grouped in a single category. For example, the author considers the Presa Canario and the bull-mastiff as a single breed which he counts in the same category. In reality, these two dogs are of different origins, and even have a different physical appearance. The Presa Canario saw the light of day in the 15th century in the Canary Islands, whereas the bull-mastiff appeared at the end of the 19th century in England.

Conversely, we find a category for the “Blue Heeler”, one for the “Australian Blue Heeler”, and another for the “Queensland Heeler”, while these all refer to a single breed of dog, the Australian Cattle Dog. We can also see breeds of dogs that do not exist, such as the East Highland terrier.

Merrit Clifton also claims on his site that the Cane Corso is a cross between pit-bull and mastiff, which is impossible, since the Cane Corso is an Italian dog which has existed since Ancient Rome, whereas the pit bull saw the light of day in England in the 19th century.

Additionally, when many dogs are involved in an attack, it is possible that the incident is classified solely in the pit bull category. For example, in 2007, an 18 year old man was attacked by 13 dogs, including one pit bull and 12 of unidentified breed, but this attack is regardless counted in the pit bull category.

Statistics from classified ads

In his report on dog attacks from 1982 to 2016, Merritt Clifton indicates what proportion each dog breed makes up in the total population of dogs. However, there is no dog census throughout the United States and Canada, and the mandatory registration imposed by municipalities is not always observed by owners, which makes it impossible to know the population of each dog breed in North America.

Hence, to estimate the dog population, Merrit Clifton explains that he checked the dog sales classified ads on various web sites for the month of July 2016. He concludes that pit bulls represent 5% of dogs and he considers that this number is representative of dog populations throughout Canada and the United States for a period of 34 years.

Merrit Clifton replies that he has proceeded this way because there is no other database of dog populations. “In Canada and the United States, only 10% of dogs were registered in 1982 and it’s roughly 25% today. No American city has a registration rate above 40%”, he explains.

Deaths indirectly attributed to dogs

The Animals 24-7 site sometimes considers that a person has been killed by a pit bull even if the dog was only indirectly involved. These cases are counted in the same category as those where the dog has bitten the victim, even when the coroner maintains that the dog was not responsible for the death.

Here are some cases that Animals 24-7 considers as deaths caused by pit bulls:

  • In 2009, in Wisconsin, Louanne Okapal, a 55 year old woman, died after having been struck in the face by her horse. The horse had been frightened by a pit bull.
  • In 2009, Teresa Foss, a 48 year old woman, died from a head wound after having been knocked over by a pit bull. The dog had not bitten her.
  • In 2010, Richard Martratt, a 64 year old Texas man, stabbed a pit bull and slaughtered a Catahoula because the two dogs had attacked a border collie on his property. The man was not attacked by the dogs, but when the authorities arrived, he collapsed and died from a heart attack.
  • In 2010, in Georgia, Miracle Parham, a 14 year old teenage girl, fled after having been frightened by a dog that witnesses described as a pit bull. She was fatally struck by a car.
  • In 2013, James Harding, a 63 year old man, was struck by a car after having attempted to get away from two pit bulls.
  • A 6 year old girl was strangled by a chain to which a pit bull was tethered. The year and location were not specified.

Another case mentioned on DogsBite.org deals with James Chapple, a 57 year old Tennessee man who was seriously injured by pit bulls in 2007. Four months later, he died of atherosclerosis and complications from alcoholism. Despite that, DogsBite.org counts him as a death caused by pit bulls.

At odds with the scientific community

Both groups are very critical of scientific experts. The DogsBite.org site even goes as far as using the term “science whore” to describe some experts. Colleen Lynn, the site founder, defends herself by saying that the term did not originate from her and that it was only used on three occasions since the creation of the site in 2007.

In addition, as opposed to studies published in scientific journals, the statistics from these groups are not reviewed by independent experts in order to verify their validity.

Karen Overall, researcher in veterinary medicine from the University of Pennsylvania, has analyzed all the studies of dog bite statistics published between 1950 and 2000 throughout the world. Her research shows that the dog breeds responsible for the largest number of attacks vary based on the year and the region studied.

She is critical of the methodology used by the groups who depend mainly on media stories. “The reports by the media and by the police are almost always incomplete, she says, and there is no independent confirmation of the breed involved. These publications use these reports as if they were infallible.”

CORRECTION:
A previous version of this article erroneously reported that Animals 24-7 had tabulated over 34 years, 7045 dog attacks causing serious injury, 4424 attacks having mutilated or disfigured the victim, and 657 deaths and that pit bulls would be responsible for 64% of serious attacks, 66% of attacks having mutilated or disfigured the victim, and 51% of deaths. Regardless, this in no way changes anything in the analysis of it which was done nor in the conclusions we have reached.

Translation by Phil Boutros.

For more information on this topic, visit the HugABull website.
Statistics and soundbites
– Breed and bites

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Radio-Canada takes a bite out of pseudoscience

Announcing our 2017 calendar

fairy-tailsThe 2017 calendar has landed, and it’s magical! This year’s theme is “Fairy Tails” featuring our adorable alumni in the roles of your favourite fairy tale characters.

A big thank you this year to Sit Stay Studios and Samantha Leigh Smith Design who donated hours of their time to make this project possible. Because of their pro bono work, and through the proud pet owners who sponsored “mini-headshots” to offset printing costs, the full $20 purchase price can support the dogs in our care. Here’s how to get your copy!

1. Attend our Open House on Sunday, November 27 at Dizine Canine Training Centre at 1730 Vernon Drive. Keep an eye on our Facebook event page or check out our website for information on this and other upcoming events.

2. Place an order through our online store.

3. Visit one of our partner vendors (see full list below). More will be listed in the coming weeks.

4. Buy in bulk! If you buy 10 calendars, we will deliver to your home in Vancouver, Burnaby, New Westminster, Delta, Ladner, Richmond, Surrey, or the Tri-Cities. Don’t need delivery? Buy 10 calendars and we’ll throw in an 11th for free!

Mainland

Burnaby
Tisol – Market Crossing
Van Pet Burnaby (North Burnaby) 
Waterworkz Paw Spa

Chilliwack
Silhouette Spa & Laser – coming soon

Coquitlam
Pet Food ‘N More

Langley
Poco Military 
Tisol – Langley
Urban Pets 

Maple Ridge
Pet Food ‘N More

New Westminster
Bosley’s – Columbia Square 
Mindful Mutts 
Royal City Paws Pet Centre
Van Pet New West 

North Vancouver
Pet Food ‘N More

Richmond
Pet Food ‘N More
Tisol – Richmond

Surrey
Elemental Canine
Mother Hubbard’s Pet Food & Supplies
Pet Food ‘N More
South Point Pet Hospital  
Tisol – South Surrey

Vancouver
Dogplay Daycare (South Van)
Dogsmart Training and Daycare
(South Van) 
Infighting MMA (downtown)
Long Live Cats and Dogs  (East Van) 
KK Pet Beauty (westside)
Moonlight Dog Cafe (downtown)
Pet Food ‘N More – Oak
Pet Food ‘N More – West 10th
Simply Natural Raw Pet Food (Kerrisdale) 
Tisol – Arbutus
Tisol – Grandview
Tisol – Main Street
Woofgang Pet Supplies (Cambie) 

Okanagan and Interior

Kamloops
Calling All Pets
We Love Dogs – Daycare & Exercise Centre

Vernon
Healthy Spot

Salmon Arm
Shuswap Veterinary Clinic

Sorrento
Old Dog New Tricks – coming soon

More locations to be listed throughout November – please keep checking back!

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Announcing our 2017 calendar

What do we do about Montreal?

Are you outraged by Montreal’s breed ban? Any animal lover should be. The new legislation makes pet ownership very onerous for any citizen. Here’s how to put that passion to work for change.

14502735_1232106943477691_5559885705516859762_nWhat should I do right now?
We believe strongly that the best way to help Montreal at this time is to donate towards the legal fees of the Montreal SPCA’s lawsuit. We believe this is the best way to reverse the legislation and set a precedent across Canada. They have a dedicated donation page set up here: https://goo.gl/q0YwPb.

We also urge you to sign and share the two major petitions circulating:

The Montreal SPCA’s petition (there is also a lot of great information on the site): www.saferkindercommunities.com

Boycott Montreal Tourism:
http://goo.gl/F53ygW

Streets, rescued from Ontario.

Streets, rescued from Ontario.

What about the dogs? We need to save the dogs!
The spotlight on Montreal’s breed ban has brought on a flood of interest in saving dogs at risk. The Montreal SPCA and their partner rescues will be looking out for these animals and will keep the public updated about any urgent need. In the meantime, if you have the ability to adopt or foster, please contact a local reputable bully rescue and help a dog in your community. You will be saving a life AND freeing up resources for that group if a Montreal dog needs help in the future.

Remember also that the entire province of Ontario has a similar breed ban (11 years and counting), and pit bull type dogs still come into their shelters on a regular basis. They can’t be adopted out within the province and face death if not transferred. Sit With Me and Bullies in Need are two rescues that work every day to save Ontario dogs and adopt them outside the province. They are also in a good position, geographically, to help with dogs in Quebec if the time comes.

We do NOT recommend donating to anyone claiming that they are transporting large numbers of dogs from Montreal for re-homing. To our knowledge, the Montreal SPCA has not endorsed or partnered with any organization for mass transfer, and most fundraising initiatives at this stage are based on hypothetical dog transports.

If you are close to Montreal and wish to adopt a dog directly, visit the Montreal SPCA’s Petfinder page (check daily): https://goo.gl/JziGDB.

You can use Petfinder to search among other Montreal shelters and rescues as well. Please note that presence on Petfinder does not guarantee the rescue is reputable. Prepare to ask questions and do your own screening. See our previous blog post for more information.

I’ve done all that! What else can I do?
prv0308npride010
Organize a fundraiser. Support a local reputable bully rescue, anti-BSL organization, or the Montreal SPCA. We heard of a group fundraising for dog owners in Montreal so they can meet the expenses associated with keeping their dog under the new bylaw: spay/neuter, licensing fees, etc. We think this is a fantastic idea. Why not keep dogs in homes while the legislation is challenged in the courts?

Organize an awareness event. Partner with your local pet store, vet, or other supportive organization.

Organize a peaceful, respectful rally. Check in with local bully rescues and organizations to find resources and tips on how to stage a successful event.

Here are a few of the non-profit organizations that can help steer you in the right direction for support, fundraising, and rescue resources in your area:

For questions regarding the new regulation, please contact 311 if you live in Montreal. Outside Montreal, call 514-872-0311.

Content has been adapted from information provided by the Montreal SPCA and Justice for Bullies. It will be updated as new resources become available.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on What do we do about Montreal?

Letter to Montreal City Councillors

muralThe letter below was sent to all Montreal City Councillors on September 23, 2016, on behalf of the Dog Legislation Council of Canada, HugABull, Justice for Bullies, and the Ontario “Pit Bull” Co-op.

September 23, 2016

City councillors
Montréal, Québec

Dear Sir/Madam:

In June of this year, the Dog Legislation Council of Canada offered assistance and experience to Mayor Coderre in drafting an effective animal control bylaw.

Three months later, we find ourselves in the same position again – offering help and hoping for a reasonable and personal reply, rather than an automated computer-generated e-mail response.

We would like to put aside, for the moment, the many arguments against breed-specific legislation such as breed identification problems, behaviour prediction by appearance, mixed breed dogs, and the targeting of purebred dogs, some of which don’t exist in the entire province of Québec.

We would like to focus on one thing only: Breed specific legislation does not work.

It has been proven, over and over again, that breed-specific legislation fails to reduce dog bites and fails to reduce serious injuries or deaths from dog attacks.

It is possible that some city councillors believe that authorities will be able to identify every “pit bull” in Montréal or that “pit bulls” are inherently dangerous or any number of other scientifically disproven theories.

To the citizens of Montréal, to the voters of Montréal, those theories are irrelevant.

The only question they have is, “Are you going to keep us safe?”

The data proves, unequivocally, that breed-specific legislation fails to do that. The experts agree, unanimously, that breed- specific legislation fails to do that.

The experiences of Ontario, Winnipeg, Vancouver, Denver, Ohio, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Italy, and Australia, as well as countless municipalities throughout North America and numerous studies by scientific experts prove that breed-specific legislation costs more money, fails to improve public safety, and kills thousands of unoffending family pets based solely on the way they look.

Finally, a couple of very important closing points:

1. Just in case some city councillors have not read the bylaw in its entirety, there are some clauses that should concern any animal lover, regardless of their position on this subject:

During the transitional phase until special licensing is granted to “pit bulls”, these dogs will be required to be muzzled at all times, including inside their homes and cars. There is no exception for puppies, old dogs, sick dogs, therapy dogs, or service dogs. After the transitional phase, they will be required to be muzzled in their own backyards. There is also no exception after the transitional phase for puppies, old dogs, sick dogs, therapy dogs, or service dogs. Any animal behaviourist will tell you that the negative impact on these dogs will actually create fear and aggression that was not there before.

Every “pit bull” in every shelter or rescue group in Montréal will be required to be destroyed immediately. There is no transfer of ownership allowed so if an owner dies, their dog must be killed. There is no provision for dogs who defend their property, their owner, or themselves. Those dogs must be killed. Any dog that is found without a muzzle/microchip/tag or that it is picked up by animal control for any reason must be killed.

2. We’ve noticed an increase in letters to city councillors from U.S. based anti “pit bull” groups. It can be overwhelming to receive the massive amount of “data” that they send to city officials. It is important to note that these groups consist of a very small number of people who get their data from a single person in the United States. His data has been carefully analyzed and it is the conclusion of analysts and researchers that his data of bites, deaths, and canine population has been highly falsified, is incomplete and incorrect to the point of being unusable, and cannot be relied upon to make any conclusions regarding dog bites and public safety. If you would like more information about that, we would be happy to send it to you. In the meantime, his supporters (even “disciples” would not be too strong a word) inundate thousands of websites and Facebook groups with copies of this data and then distribute it to the general public through journalists such as Lori Welbourne (Vancouver Province), Barbara Kay (National Post), and Marie-Claude Malboeuf (La Presse). The latter’s “investigative reports” have now managed to become a quoted source in the working group report commissioned by the government of Québec and, as such, are going to influence provincial policy decisions, all based on one man’s falsified data in the United States. That alone should worry you enough to, at the very least, delay this decision until you have had the opportunity to verify the data you are being sent.

If you would like any more information about fair and effective animal control legislation that has been proven to reduce dog bites and improve public safety, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

LeeAnn O’Reilly
President
Dog Legislation Council of Canada

Mireille Goulet
Quebec Region Representative
Dog Legislation Council of Canada

Steve Barker
Head of Research
Dog Legislation Council of Canada

April Fahr
Executive Director
HugABull

Chantelle Mackney
Director
Justice For Bullies

Debra Black
Founder
Ontario “Pit Bull” Co-op

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Letter to Montreal City Councillors

September’s Foster Roster

August kicked off to a great start, with Moxie busting out of boarding and settling into a new foster home. She’s been having an absolute blast with her new foster brother Rowan, but she is still on the hunt for a forever homemoxie. Moxie is full of energy and loves life – she wakes up every morning with her bum wriggling in excitement for the day to begin.

She’s looking for a home where she can enjoy an active lifestyle which could include running, hiking, or even dog sports. Moxie excels in learning new things, is crate trained and adores other dogs – so much so that she can come on a little strong and needs to be coached through calm introductions. Overall Moxie is a one of a kind and would make a wonderful companion for someone who’s looking for an active dog to keep up with them.

Coco is also currently available for adoption. Sweet Coco is a young, energetic dog who is looking for a special someone to show her the ropes.  Coco is still a puppy at heart and needs someone who will continue to work with her on img_20160415_160110her training and leash manners using lots of positive reinforcement.

She tends to be a little on the anxious side, so she would do best in a home with consistency and boundaries so she can continue to build her confidence. One of Coco’s best qualities is her eagerness to learn, and with her awesome personality so we know that with the right home, she will excel and be the best dog she can be.

If you would like to learn more about Moxie or Coco, or how to submit an adoption application please check out our adoptables page or email hugabullfoster@gmail.com.

Moxie is sponsored in loving memory of Jessica Coulter-Brown. A special thank you to Dierdre, Kayla, Helen & Ruth, Sonya & Amanda, Kimberley, Torin and Rita for being Moxie’s HugABull Angels!

If you are interested in sponsoring a dog, please click here for more information.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on September’s Foster Roster